wordpress-seo
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/mysavvys/public_html/TheFeistyNews.Com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114bunyad
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/mysavvys/public_html/TheFeistyNews.Com/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Lead photo: the Pratigya Campaign team<\/p>\n
This blog post was written before the COVID-19 outbreak. <\/em><\/p>\n Women\u2019s ability to access safe and legal abortion is restricted in law or in practice in many countries around the world. As a result, tens of thousands of women die every year due to the complications arising from unsafe abortion. Access to safe abortion is not just a basic reproductive right, but also an integral part of a woman\u2019s bodily autonomy and integrity.<\/p>\n In India, the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act 1971 (\u201cMTP Act\u201d) allows women to undergo an abortion up to 20 weeks, subject to certain conditions. The legislation is outdated as it has not kept up with the changing discourse on sexual and reproductive rights and advancements in medical technology. It is estimated that 15.6 million abortions take place annually in India[1]<\/a>, however, there are just 60-70,000 providers who can legally provide abortions under the MTP Act[2]<\/a> which inevitably leads to a considerable number of unsafe abortions.<\/p>\n While the leading cause of restriction of women\u2019s access to safe and legal abortions in India is stigma, there are also other pertinent causes. Women\u2019s lack of awareness of and education on the law, doctors\/practitioners\u2019 refusal to provide abortions citing the law preventing sex-selective abortion and delays in court decisions on abortions, are among them.<\/p>\n The Pratigya Campaign for gender equality and safe abortion<\/a> is a collective of 110+ individuals and organisations <\/strong>advocating for women\u2019s empowerment and to improve women\u2019s access to abortion healthcare services in India.[3]<\/a> The Campaign works to address the barriers to women\u2019s access to abortion services in India and to protect women\u2019s right to safe and legal abortions while simultaneously addressing the serious issue of sex-selective abortions.<\/p>\n The Campaign works with the government, organisations and the media at the national and state levels to:<\/p>\n Research is an important part of how the Campaign seeks to achieve its goals. In 2019 two studies were undertaken: one on the availability of MA drugs in the markets of four Indian states and, the other, on the judiciary\u2019s role in access to safe abortion in India. Both of these have proved instrumental in guiding the Campaign\u2019s advocacy strategy.<\/p>\n The former study found that MA drugs are quickly vanishing from the markets of states such as Rajasthan and Maharashtra. The study found that 0% of chemists in Rajasthan and only 1.2% in Maharashtra are stocking the drugs. Legal hurdles were cited as the prominent reason for this among 76.6% of chemists in Rajasthan and 90.4% in Maharashtra. As MA drugs are currently the preferred method of abortion care in India, with an estimated 81% of the 15.6 million annual abortions being performed using them[4]<\/a>, their lack of availability is therefore concerning.<\/p>\n The latter study focused on assessing the judiciary\u2019s role in access to safe abortion in India. \u00a0The study revealed that there is a need for both legislative change and for the Indian Supreme Court to clarify its position abortion law so that justice can be delivered consistently across the states.[5]<\/a>\u00a0 The most significant finding of the study was that 40 out of 173 women who approached the High Courts between 2016 and 2018 were in fact below 20 weeks\u2019 gestation (abortions are permitted by the MTP Act up to 20 weeks\u2019 gestation subject to certain conditions). Even though all of these cases were allowed by the courts, the fact that they reached the courts in the first place is worrying and highlights the difficulties women face in accessing abortion services.<\/p>\n Although unsafe abortion remains an urgent public health issue internationally, women still face insurmountable barriers to accessing safe abortion services. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2010-2014, approximately 25 million unsafe abortions took place worldwide each year.[6]<\/a> In India, unsafe abortion contributes to 8% of all maternal deaths and is the third leading cause of maternal mortality. [7]<\/a>\u00a0 There is much work to be done.<\/p>\n In this day and age, it is preposterous for a woman to be denied access to a safe abortion on grounds of law, culture, or religion.\u00a0The Pratigya Campaign is working diligently to clarify the laws pertaining to women\u2019s reproductive health in India, with the view to bringing about gender equality and giving women complete agency over their bodies.<\/p>\n \u00a0<\/p>\n Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n [1]<\/a> Guttmacher Institute. Abortion and Unintended Pregnancy in Six Indian States: Findings and Implications for Policies and Programs. 2018. https:\/\/www.guttmacher.org\/report\/abortion-unintended-pregnancy-six-states-india<\/a><\/p>\n [2]<\/a> Pratigya Campaign. Improving Access to Safe Medical Abortions: Why Expanding the Provider Base is Essential. 2019. https:\/\/pratigyacampaign.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/improving-access-to-safe-medical-abortions-english.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n [3]<\/a> The Foundation for Reproductive Health Services India (<\/strong>https:\/\/www.frhsi.org.in\/<\/strong><\/a> )<\/strong> currently hosts the Campaign\u2019s secretariat.<\/p>\n [4]<\/a> Guttmacher Institute cit. ref 1.<\/p>\n [5]<\/a> Pratigya Campaign. Assessing the judiciary\u2019s role in access to safe abortion. 2019. https:\/\/pratigyacampaign.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/assessing-the-judiciarys-role-in-access-to-safe-abortion.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n [6]<\/a> World Health Organization.Worldwide, an estimated 25 million unsafe abortions occur each year. 2017.\u00a0 https:\/\/www.who.int\/news-room\/detail\/28-09-2017-worldwide-an-estimated-25-million-unsafe-abortions-occur-each-year<\/a><\/p>\n\n